Glafabra Therapeutics -- Business Plan (Public Summary) v3 · May 2026
Glafabra Therapeutics
Glafabra Therapeutics · Public Summary · May 2026

Business Plan

Live-cel: Cell-Based Gene Therapy Platform for Lysosomal Storage Disorders

Stage: Phase 1/2 Complete · IND Target Q4 2026 Raise: $1M Preseed + $15M Series A Exit Target: $1B–$5B by 2030 Version: 3.0 · Public Summary
$61M
Total 3-Year Capital Need to Exit
$1B–$5B
Targeted Acquisition Value by 2030
5 yrs
FACTS Trial Follow-Up with Zero Product-Attributable SAEs
$4.8B
Recent LSD Acquisition — Direct Comparable (April 2026)

Contents

ES

Executive Summary

Take-Away: Glafabra is a cell-based gene therapy company with assets in development for Fabry (GT-GLA-S03), Pompe (GT-GAA-S04), and Gaucher (GT-GBA1-S05).
  • In the Fabry therapy, GT-GLA-S03 was clinically demonstrated to replace a lifetime of biweekly intravenous infusions with a single outpatient procedure delivering at least five years of durable therapeutic benefit.
  • Clinical advantages are three:
    1. GT-GLA-S03 can be re-administered when enzyme levels eventually decline.
    2. GT-GLA-S03 is accessible to every Fabry patient regardless of the type of genetic variant they carry.
    3. GT-GLA-S03 requires only a non-myeloablative outpatient conditioning regimen, removing the toxicity barrier that ended all predecessor cell-based programs.

Five patients have now been followed for five years in a clinical trial conducted in Canada with zero product-attributable serious adverse events.

Dimension Summary
Disease & Unmet Need Fabry disease is a rare, progressive, X-linked lysosomal storage disorder caused by deficiency of the enzyme alpha-galactosidase A (alpha-Gal A), encoded by the GLA gene. Without adequate alpha-Gal A activity, a toxic lipid substrate accumulates throughout the body, causing progressive kidney failure, cardiac disease, stroke, and chronic pain. The current standard of care is enzyme replacement therapy (ERT): biweekly intravenous infusions for life at an annual cost of $250,000 to $450,000+ per patient. ERT controls but does not cure the disease, does not reach all affected tissue compartments, and imposes a severe lifelong treatment burden. Approximately 40% of ERT patients develop anti-drug antibodies (ADA) that further reduce its effectiveness over time. No curative therapy has been approved. Approximately 5,000 to 10,000 patients are currently treated in the United States and Europe.
Platform Live-cel (lentivirus-mediated autologous cell-based gene therapy). Same manufacturing process applied across Fabry (GT-GLA-S03), Pompe (GT-GAA-S04), and Gaucher (GT-GBA1-S05). Extensible to hundreds of enzyme deficiency disorders.
Lead Asset GT-GLA-S03 (Fabry disease). Published 5-year FACTS trial data: 48% reduction in plasma lyso-Gb3 from the no-ERT baseline (p<0.0001, 99% power); zero product-attributable SAEs across all 5 patients and all follow-up. Intellectual property: exclusive option on U.S. patent 12,540,336 (issued; covers the lentiviral vector technology used in manufacturing) and related PCT application WO2021242719A1 (same patent family, claiming priority from provisional application 63/030,820 filed 2020; also covering the lentiviral vector). These filings protect the vector platform; they do not contain claims directed to treating Fabry disease specifically. Glafabra also holds FDA Orphan Drug Designation for GT-GLA-S03 as the current primary regulatory exclusivity mechanism.
Competitive Position GT-GLA-S03 is designed as a first-line curative therapy, offering every Fabry patient the possibility of five or more years free from biweekly infusions regardless of their GLA variant. Its key advantage over all other gene therapy approaches is re-administrability: because Live-cel uses the patient's own modified cells rather than a viral vector, no neutralizing antibody response develops, and the therapy can be given again when enzyme levels decline after year five. This is a clinically and commercially fundamental difference from adeno-associated virus (AAV)-based therapies such as Sangamo's ST-920, which is under BLA review and may be the first approved gene therapy in Fabry disease but cannot be re-administered once the immune response to AAV has formed. Live-cel's first-line positioning is complemented by a secondary market: as AAV-treated patients experience waning expression, Live-cel will be the only available follow-on option, representing a growing population that no other program can serve.
Partnering Progress Glafabra has initiated structured engagement with select leading biopharmaceutical companies with established lysosomal storage disorder commercial presence. Engagement structures under discussion include regional licensing, co-development arrangements, and option-to-acquire frameworks. A detailed partner engagement brief is available to qualified investors and strategic partners under NDA.
Regulatory Interactions INTERACT Meeting: Glafabra has submitted an INTERACT meeting request to the FDA, initiating formal pre-IND dialogue on the GT-GLA-S03 development program. The INTERACT process provides early agency feedback on clinical, manufacturing, and regulatory strategy prior to IND filing (targeted Q4 2026). Orphan Drug Designation (ODD): Granted for Fabry disease (GT-GLA-S03); applications pending for Pompe (GT-GAA-S04) and Gaucher (GT-GBA1-S05). ODD confers seven years of U.S. market exclusivity upon approval and eligibility for tax credits on clinical trial costs. Priority Review Vouchers (PRV): Pompe and Gaucher qualify for Rare Pediatric Disease Designation (RPDD) and PRV precedent is established (Nexviazyme 2021, Pombiliti 2023), representing defensible near-term value of up to $200M. Fabry PRV is first-of-kind with no prior precedent; treat as upside optionality, not base-case.
Current Raise $1M Preseed SAFEs plus $15M Series A ($16M combined). Funds IND filing, manufacturing scale-up at University of Utah, and First Patient Enrolled mid-2027. Total 3-year capital need: $61M.
1

The Problem: Treatment Burden in Enzyme Deficiency Disorders

What Is Fabry Disease?

Fabry disease is a rare, X-linked lysosomal storage disorder caused by pathogenic variants in the GLA gene, which encodes the enzyme alpha-galactosidase A (alpha-Gal A). When alpha-Gal A activity is absent or severely reduced, a lipid substrate called globotriaosylceramide (Gb3) and its deacylated form (lyso-Gb3) accumulate progressively in the lysosomes of cells throughout the body. The consequence is a multi-system disease: patients develop chronic neuropathic pain beginning in childhood, progressive kidney dysfunction leading to renal failure in the third to fourth decade of life, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and cardiac arrhythmias, and early stroke. Most patients also experience debilitating fatigue, gastrointestinal disturbance, and hearing loss. Life expectancy is reduced by approximately 15 to 20 years compared to the general population.

The disease affects all GLA variant types, though the clinical spectrum varies. Classic disease (near-zero enzyme activity) presents with the full multi-system burden described above. Patients with residual enzyme activity may present later but face the same progressive organ damage trajectory. Migalastat (Galafold), an oral pharmacological chaperone, is approved only for patients who carry an amenable GLA variant, which represents approximately 35 to 50% of the Fabry population. The remaining 50 to 65% have no oral option.

Prevalence estimates range from 1 in 40,000 to 1 in 117,000 live births, though the true prevalence is believed to be significantly higher due to diagnostic underrecognition, particularly in women. Approximately 5,000 to 10,000 patients are currently receiving enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) in the United States and Europe combined, representing a market generating over $1.5 billion annually for Sanofi (Fabrazyme) and Chiesi (Elfabrio) alone.

The Current Standard of Care Falls Short

Current treatments for lysosomal storage disorders impose a severe and lifelong burden that is both clinical and personal. The problem operates on four dimensions:

Dimension Patient Reality Clinical Consequence
The Infusion Anchor Biweekly 4-hour IV infusions are a permanent fixture dictating career choices, travel, and family schedules. Patients describe "living life in two-week increments." A Fabry patient on ERT for 20 years spends more than two full months in an infusion chair. High treatment discontinuation risk; poor quality-of-life outcomes that clinical endpoints alone do not capture.
The Yo-Yo Effect Enzyme levels peak after each infusion and trough before the next. Patients experience a cycle: feeling relatively well, then feeling disease symptoms return in the final days before the next dose. ERT controls but never eliminates the awareness of illness. Patients never achieve the physiologic normality that steady, continuous enzyme expression can provide.
The ADA Barrier Approximately 40% of ERT patients develop anti-drug antibodies over time that neutralize the infused enzyme. For these patients, ERT is not merely inconvenient -- it is clinically failing them. ADA-positive patients have no approved curative alternative and are frequently excluded from AAV gene therapy trials. They represent one of the most medically urgent unmet-need populations for Phase 2.
Clinical Limits of ERT Short half-life means toxic metabolites begin accumulating almost immediately after each infusion. ERT fails to reach all necessary body compartments, particularly the heart and nervous system. Continued cardiac and renal progression despite adherence to ERT is well-documented in the literature. Annual costs of $250,000 to $450,000+ per patient do not prevent long-term organ damage.
Patient Voices after the FACTS Trial

These are not abstract clinical limitations. FACTS trial participants and others describe the burden in their own words:

Ryan Deveau — FACTS Trial, Patient #4
"The benefits were many. I have felt the BEST I have felt in my life since the transplant. I had about 4 years with no ERT and I gained back all that time with my family. At one point my wife and I realized we were forgetting I had Fabry at all. This was quite the surprise for us. Re-doing this kind of procedure would absolutely be worth any drawbacks."
On returning to ERT: "I definitely miss the freedom. I am now back on a bi-weekly infusion schedule. It will be a constant reminder that I am sick."
Darren Bidulka — FACTS Trial, Patient #1
"We should focus on the 'healthspan' versus 'lifespan' of a Fabry patient. A person is living their life in two-week increments. A person cannot help but feel 'sick' when they get an infusion bi-weekly, along with the knowledge that ERT is an imperfect treatment. There is also the mental health aspect."
After Live-cel: "Stopped ERT with benefits to productivity, travel flexibility, general schedule flexibility."
Timothy Holleran — Unsolicited Inquiry, AAV Follow-On Patient
"I hated doing bi-weekly infusions. I'm hoping to qualify for gene therapy again."
Timothy, 36, enrolled in an AAV gene therapy trial at Emory University (4DMT). After approximately two years his body stopped producing the enzyme — he is now in year four of the study with no active gene expression and no path back through AAV. His variant is not amenable to migalastat. He was referred to Glafabra by his clinical contact at Emory and reached out directly. He has agreed to provide further input and may be a Phase 2 enrollment candidate. He is the real patient that Live-cel's re-administrability was designed for: AAV worked, then it stopped, and no other curative option exists.
Brinley Highland — Patient Interview, Phoenix Children's Hospital
"It literally felt like I was walking through fire every day. Providers would tell me girls can't have symptoms and unhook me from the monitor because my elevated heart rate was 'beeping too much.' Over the past four years the pain has been continuous and progressive. I'm open to clinical trials both to potentially improve my own condition and to help prevent other young patients from experiencing similar suffering."
Brinley was diagnosed with Fabry at age 9–10 as a spontaneous mutation (twin brother unaffected; no family history). Despite assumptions she would be an asymptomatic carrier, she developed severe symptoms by age 12–13: constant neuropathic pain, migraines, inability to sweat, GI issues, and extreme temperature sensitivity. She has tried Fabrazyme (discontinued after severe flares), Elfabrio (ongoing, limited benefit), and gabapentin (ineffective). She currently manages pain with biweekly ketamine infusions. Her treating Fabry specialist is Dr. Jasmine Knoll at Phoenix Children's Hospital. Brinley's case illustrates two critical gaps Live-cel is positioned to address: the failure of current ERT options for a significant subset of patients, and the systemic underdiagnosis and undertreatment of Fabry disease in females.
2

Our Solution: Live-cel Technology

Glafabra's Live-cel is a lentivirus-mediated gene therapy using the patient's own engineered cells to produce the missing enzyme internally. Patient cells are harvested, genetically engineered to express the corrected enzyme, and re-introduced into the patient. The modified cells distribute throughout the body, secrete the enzyme, and neighboring cells take it up to halt toxic metabolite accumulation.

How Live-cel Compares to Existing and Emerging Therapies
Feature Standard ERT Migalastat (Oral) AAV Gene Therapy (Sangamo ST-920) Glafabra Live-cel
Dosing Frequency Every 2 weeks (lifelong) Daily oral (lifelong) One-time only Every 5+ years
Durability Days Daily (ongoing) Years (waning) 5+ Years (clinically proven)
Repeatable? Yes Yes No -- neutralizing antibodies prevent re-administration Yes -- no antibody barrier
Patient Eligibility All variants ~35–50% amenable variants only Most patients (excluding prior exposure) All variants; full Fabry population
Conditioning None None None Non-myeloablative outpatient melphalan (4 of 5 FACTS patients outpatient)
Approval Status Approved Approved (limited variants) BLA under FDA review (2025–2026) Phase 2 IND target Q4 2026
The Sangamo Competitive Context

Sangamo's AAV program (isaralgagene civaparvovec, ST-920) is under a rolling BLA submission and may become the first approved gene therapy for Fabry disease. This validates the curative gene therapy market for Fabry and demonstrates FDA's willingness to approve in this indication.

However, ST-920 has a structural limitation that Live-cel is specifically designed to address. AAV creates neutralizing antibodies, making re-administration impossible. When ST-920 expression wanes after 3–5 years, the patient has no path back to gene therapy through that program. A real patient (Timothy Holleran, 36 years old) enrolled in a 4DMT AAV trial at Emory University has already lost active gene expression after approximately two years and reached out to Glafabra directly, stating he "hated doing bi-weekly infusions" and hoping to qualify for gene therapy again. He is not amenable to migalastat. He represents the real patient that Live-cel's re-administrability advantage was designed for.

The Orchard Differentiation: RIC vs. Myeloablative Conditioning

Orchard Therapeutics (now part of Kyowa Kirin) pioneered the same therapeutic modality as Live-cel: lentivirus-mediated hematopoietic stem cell gene correction for lysosomal storage disorders. The underlying science is closely related. The commercial and clinical difference lies entirely in the conditioning regimen required before cell infusion.

Orchard's OTL-203 program employs full myeloablative conditioning — a busulfan-based regimen equivalent in intensity to bone marrow transplant preparation. For Fabry disease, this is a disqualifying constraint. Fabry patients skew older and carry significant cardiac and renal comorbidities as a direct consequence of the disease itself. A large fraction of this population cannot safely tolerate myeloablative chemotherapy, which effectively caps the eligible patient pool at a small, healthier minority.

Live-cel substitutes reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) using single-agent melphalan at non-myeloablative doses. The result: four of five FACTS trial patients received conditioning as an outpatient procedure and returned home the same day. This distinction is not incremental — it is the specific technical gap that ended AVROBIO's AVR-RD-01 program in 2022 and the gap that Live-cel was engineered to close. Where Orchard's platform reaches a conditioning-tolerant subset, Live-cel reaches the full Fabry patient population.

Clinical Proof: The FACTS Trial

The FACTS trial (NCT02800070), led by co-founders Jeff Medin and Ronan Foley, followed 5 patients for 5 years (PMIDs 33633114, 39794302, 36816757).

Outcome Result
Lyso-Gb3 Reduction 48% reduction from the no-ERT baseline (p<0.0001, 99% statistical power). 4 of 5 patients maintain lyso-Gb3 below the clinically elevated threshold at year 5. Note: this reflects the no-ERT baseline comparison. The direct ERT-versus-cell-therapy comparison yielded 7% reduction at 47% statistical power; superiority over ERT will be formally powered in the U.S. Phase 2 trial.
5-Year Durable Expression All 5 patients maintain therapeutic enzyme levels at 5-year follow-up. Zero product-attributable serious adverse events across all patients and all follow-up time.
ERT Discontinuation 3 of 5 patients elected to discontinue ERT. 2 remain off ERT at year 5 with no resumption required. 1 resumed at year 4 on clinician recommendation following rising biomarker levels, confirming monitoring protocols function as intended.
Integration Safety Comprehensive DNA insertion-site analysis of all 5 patients (PMID 36816757) found no evidence of clonal dominance or leukemogenic transformation. Integration profile was polyclonal, consistent with the modern lentiviral gene therapy safety database.
Conditioning Delivery Non-myeloablative reduced-intensity melphalan conditioning was delivered as an outpatient procedure for 4 of 5 FACTS patients. This is the critical differentiator from the myeloablative approach that ended AVROBIO.
Patient Preference 100% of interviewed trial patients expressed preference for repeating Live-cel over returning to ERT.
Platform Technology
Asset Indication Status Regulatory PRV Risk Profile
GT-GLA-S03 Fabry Disease Phase 1/2 complete; IND filing Q4 2026 ODD granted; RPDD pending First-of-kind (no prior RPDD/PRV precedent in Fabry). Treat as upside optionality.
GT-GAA-S04 Pompe Disease Preclinical; animal model efficacy demonstrated ODD and RPDD eligible Low risk. Established PRV precedent: Nexviazyme (2021), Pombiliti (2023).
GT-GBA1-S05 Gaucher Disease Preclinical; development in animal models ODD and RPDD eligible Low-to-moderate risk. Precedent from multiple sponsors in pediatric Gaucher programs.
Priority Review Voucher Note (Risk-Stratified). Glafabra holds RPDD eligibility across all three programs. PRVs have recently traded above $100M and are fully transferable. Pompe and Gaucher represent the defensible near-term PRV value (established precedent; up to $200M). The Fabry PRV would be first-of-kind for that indication; treat as upside optionality, not a base-case assumption. Verify against the FDA published PRV log before external use in deal materials.
3

Market Opportunity

Metric Detail
Total Addressable Market $500B+ enzyme replacement market if diagnosed and undiagnosed patients globally across Fabry, Pompe, and Gaucher could be reached. Approximately 2 million patients worldwide.
Serviceable Market Sanofi generates approximately $3B annually from ERT across Fabry, Gaucher, and Pompe from approximately 20,000 treated patients. CAGR in the low double digits, doubling approximately every 5 years.
Initial Focus Fabry disease (estimated $3B+ current market). A recent $4.8B acquisition in the LSD space (April 2026) establishes a directly comparable transaction benchmark and validates the commercial urgency of this market.
ADA Patient Segment Approximately 40% of ERT patients develop anti-drug antibodies over time, reducing ERT effectiveness. This population has no approved curative alternative and is frequently excluded from AAV trials. They represent one of the highest-priority Phase 2 enrollment populations.
AAV Follow-On Market As AAV gene therapies (including Sangamo ST-920 if approved) wane after 3–5 years, a growing population will have no curative alternative except Live-cel. This is a durable, expanding secondary market that Live-cel uniquely occupies. One such patient has already contacted Glafabra proactively.
Platform Expansion The Live-cel manufacturing process is applicable to hundreds of other genetic enzyme deficiencies. Planned expansion into Pompe and Gaucher adds multi-indication PRV optionality and broadens the platform thesis.
4

Competitive Advantage

The Three Structural Advantages
Advantage What It Means Commercial Significance
Repeatability Unlike AAV, Live-cel carries no neutralizing antibody barrier. Re-administration is feasible when enzyme levels decline. Extends commercial life of the asset. Patients whose AAV therapy has waned have no other long-acting curative option. When Sangamo ST-920 expression declines in treated patients, Live-cel is the only available follow-on. A Glafabra-treated patient whose levels decline after year 5 returns for re-treatment, not to a competitor.
Non-myeloablative Conditioning Outpatient reduced-intensity melphalan replaces the bone-marrow-transplant-level chemotherapy required by Orchard/Kyowa Kirin's HSC-LV approach. Broadens the eligible patient pool from a conditioning-tolerant minority to the full Fabry population. Removes the primary commercial risk that ended AVROBIO's program in 2022–2023. AVROBIO's failure was not a technology failure; it was a conditioning burden failure. Live-cel passes the test AVROBIO could not.
Platform Breadth Same Live-cel manufacturing applied to Fabry, Pompe, and Gaucher. Extensible to hundreds of enzyme deficiencies. Rapamycin T-cell micropharmacy platform (PMID 35298086) demonstrates enzyme delivery to kidney and heart in murine models of Fabry, Gaucher, Farber, and Pompe. An acquirer receives a platform, not a single asset. Three programs with differentiated PRV optionality. Pompe and Gaucher PRVs represent up to $200M in defensible non-dilutive value for any acquirer.
Conditioning Differentiation: The AVROBIO Precedent

AVROBIO's AVR-RD-01 used full myeloablative busulfan conditioning, restricting the eligible patient pool to those who can tolerate bone-marrow-transplant-level preparation. AVROBIO discontinued in 2022–2023; conditioning burden was central. Kathy Nicholls, one of Australia's leading Fabry specialists, summarized it precisely: "The tech actually worked but the conditioning changes killed it." The Live-cel program exists specifically to fix that.

Glafabra uses non-myeloablative reduced-intensity melphalan conditioning, delivered as an outpatient procedure for 4 of 5 FACTS patients. This distinction is clinically and commercially material: Live-cel broadens the eligible patient pool from the small subset who can tolerate myeloablation to the full Fabry patient population.

Full Competitive Landscape
Standard ERT Migalastat Sangamo ST-920 (AAV) Kyowa Kirin / Orchard (HSC-LV) Glafabra Live-cel
Dosing Every 2 wks (lifelong) Daily oral (lifelong) One-time only One-time only Every 5+ years
Repeatable Yes Yes No (AAV antibodies) No (myeloablative) Yes
Patient Eligibility All variants 35–50% amenable variants only Most patients Myeloablation-tolerant subset All variants; full population
Conditioning None None None Myeloablative (BMT-level) Non-myeloablative outpatient
Live-cel Advantage Replaces this Complementary (different population) Follow-on when waned Next-generation of same modality Uniquely positioned
5

Business Model and Exit Strategy

Our primary objective is to drive all assets to Phase 2 efficacy data to de-risk for acquisition. We are raising $16M ($1M Preseed SAFEs plus $15M Series A). Targeted acquisition of $1B to $5B by 2030 upon achievement of multi-indication Phase 2 data.

Strategic Partner Engagement

Glafabra has initiated structured engagement with select leading biopharmaceutical companies that hold existing commercial infrastructure in lysosomal storage disorders. Discussions are structured across co-development, licensing, and option-to-acquire frameworks, timed to coincide with key clinical de-risking milestones.

Engagement Strategy. Our target partners are companies for whom Live-cel's non-myeloablative, repeatable, variant-agnostic platform represents a strategic complement to existing ERT or cell therapy portfolios. We are pursuing three primary engagement structures: (1) regional licensing or co-development agreements to fund U.S. Phase 2; (2) option-to-acquire arrangements executed pre-Phase 2 data at favorable pre-milestone valuation; and (3) full acquisition discussions timed to multi-indication Phase 2 readouts in 2029–2030.
Partner Engagement Summary. A detailed partner engagement brief including specific company rationales, current status, and tactical positioning is available to qualified investors and strategic partners under NDA.
6

Glafabra Team

Management Team
Role Individual
CEO / Co-FounderDr. Chris Hopkins, PhD, MBA. Serial entrepreneur; successfully exited Knudra Transgenics via acquisition.
COOElizabeth Wagner, MS, MBA. Ex-Genzyme; veteran of the ERT market and the Sanofi acquisition.
CFO (Board Member)Sidney Norton, MBA. Ex-Lilly; CFO at Primary Children's Hospital; VP Intermountain Healthcare.
Director of Clinical TrialsDr. Dwayne Barber, PhD. Former Project Manager for the Canadian FACTS trial.
Director of Medical AffairsDr. Kevin Mahenke, PharmD. Ex-Amgen.
Director of Regulatory ScienceDr. Krista Casazza, PhD. Ex-Critical Path Institute.
Director of APAC StrategiesDr. Tetsu Yung, PhD, MBA. Ex-Eisai.
Director of Business Development (Board)Isaac Collette. Prior VC fund experience.
Founding / Scientific Team
Role Individual
CSO / Board MemberDr. Jeffrey Medin, PhD. Principal inventor of the Live-cel platform.
CMO / Board MemberDr. Ronan Foley, MD. Transplant specialist; led the FACTS trial.
Advisory Team
Advisor Expertise
Dr. Michael West, MDFabry specialist, Dalhousie University. Direct clinical collaborator on FACTS trial; lead for Phase 2 site development.
Dr. Armand Keating, MDTransplant specialist, UHN (Princess Margaret). Lead FACTS trial investigator; confirmed immediate interest in Phase 2 site leadership.
Dr. Michael Summar, MD, PhDCEO, Uncommon Cures. Contracted for IND filing support.
Dr. Daniel Fowler, MDCMO, Rapa Therapeutics.
Dr. Aneal Khan, MDMetabolic specialist, MAGIC Clinic.
Laura Viaches, MBAAccess specialist, ex-Lilly.
Dr. Lara Silverman, PhDCGT regulatory expert.
Dr. Jens Lohr, MDHematologist, CelReGen.
Dr. Brian Shayota, MDMetabolic specialist, UHealth.
Dr. Amy Goodman, PhDClinical Trials specialist, UHealth.
7

Financials and Go-To-Market

Funding Requirements
Round Amount Use / Milestone
Preseed SAFEs (current)$1MBridge to Series A; early regulatory filings; IND preparation initiation.
Series A (current raise)$15MIND filing (Q4 2026), manufacturing scale-up at University of Utah, First Patient Enrolled (mid-2027).
Series B (planned 2027–2028)~$45MFund Pompe and Gaucher clinical programs; complete Phase 2 readouts across multiple indications.
Total 3-Year Capital Need~$61MFull path to $1B–$5B exit in 2030.
Use of Proceeds (Series A)
Allocation Category Detail
45%R&D and Clinical ReadinessIND-enabling studies for Fabry, manufacturing scale-up at University of Utah (Indiana Vector Production Facility for GMP vector), CMC validation.
30%Clinical OperationsRegulatory filings with FDA and Health Canada, site initiation, initial patient recruitment for U.S. Phase 2 trial. Ozmosis Inc (Toronto) contracted as CRO.
15%Intellectual Property and LegalFiling of expansion patents for Pompe and Gaucher; finalizing exclusive licensing.
10%G&A / ContingencyManagement salaries, overhead, and 10% reserve for trial timeline adjustments.
3-Year Operational Budget (USD Millions)
Expense Category Year 1 (2026) Year 2 (2027) Year 3 (2028) Total
R&D / Preclinical$0.2M$1.0M$3.0M$4.2M
Clinical Trials (Fabry)--$10.0M$12.4M$22.4M
Clinical Trials (Pompe/Gaucher)----$15.5M$15.5M
Staff & Operations$0.5M$1.7M$4.8M$7.0M
IP & Regulatory$0.3M$2.5M$3.5M$6.3M
Contingency (10%)$0.1M$1.5M$4.0M$5.6M
TOTAL NEED$1.1M$16.7M$43.2M$61.0M
8

Strategic Milestone Timeline (2026–2030)

Phase 1: IND and Site Launch (2026–2027)
Milestone Detail
Q1 2026 Submit FDA INTERACT meeting request. Initiate Health Canada pre-IND dialogue in parallel (Health Canada is significantly more accessible for early dialog and strengthens Canadian patient access).
Q4 2026 Submit IND to FDA with finalized cell manufacturing at University of Utah. Indiana Vector Production Facility for GMP vector; Ozmosis Inc (Toronto) as CRO.
Q2 2027 First Patient Enrolled (FPE) in U.S. Phase 2 trial. Anchor site: University of Utah. Satellite sites: Toronto (Keating/Iwanochko), Hamilton (Foley), Halifax (West), Cincinnati (Hopkin, pediatric), Edmonton (Jain/Oudit), Ottawa (Yu), Vancouver (Lehman). Baylor (Mehta) pending outpatient conditioning confirmation.
Phase 2: Platform Validation (2028–2029)
Milestone Detail
2028 Interim 12-month data readout for U.S. Fabry trial. Multi-modal biomarker strategy: plasma lyso-Gb3, kidney biopsies (BLISS scoring), skin biopsies, cardiac MRI with T1 mapping and LVM index, intracellular alpha-gal assay (Vocadlo lab).
2028 Proof-of-concept in Pompe and Gaucher disease animal models. Demonstration of "Platform Effect."
2028–2029 Begin active exit campaign. Leverage interim data to engage identified strategic acquirers with lysosomal storage disorder commercial presence. Competitive dynamics among multiple interested parties create favorable M&A conditions.
Phase 3: Exit Campaign (2029–2030)
Milestone Detail
2029 Multi-indication Phase 2 efficacy data confirmed across Fabry, Pompe, and Gaucher.
2030 Targeted M&A exit to a Tier-1 biopharma. Primary targets: strategic acquirers with lysosomal storage disorder commercial presence.
Goal Achieved valuation of $1B–$5B based on platform versatility, multi-year durability data, and AAV follow-on market positioning.

Closing Statement

Glafabra is not just a Fabry company; it is a platform company solving the multi-billion-dollar problem of treatment tedium without the toxicity of conditioning-based gene therapies and without the dead end of non-repeatable AAV approaches.

Live-cel replaces 26 ERT infusions a year with a single re-administrable treatment that lasts at least five years, requires no myeloablative conditioning, and applies across hundreds of enzyme deficiency disorders. One FACTS patient forgot he had Fabry for four years. Another described gaining back all that time with his family. That is the clinical standard and the commercial story.

With Sangamo's ST-920 potentially becoming the first approved Fabry gene therapy, the urgency for a repeatable, variant-agnostic, non-AAV alternative has never been higher. When ST-920 expression wanes in treated patients, Live-cel is the only available follow-on. That pipeline of future patients represents a durable, expanding market that Glafabra uniquely occupies.

With multiple Tier-1 biopharmaceutical companies holding established commercial assets across the lysosomal storage disorder space and facing displacement from curative alternatives, the strategic urgency for a durable, full-population, repeatable cell-based platform has never been higher. Glafabra is positioned to be the inevitable successor to the current standard of care.

Key Investment Metrics:  $61M total capital need  |  $1B–$5B targeted exit by 2030  |  10 identified acquirers, 3 with direct portfolio overlap  |  Phase 1/2 human data peer-reviewed in Nature Communications and Clinical and Translational Medicine  |  FDA Orphan Drug Designation granted  |  IND target Q4 2026  |  First Patient Enrolled target mid-2027

Glafabra Therapeutics · Business Plan (Public Summary) · Version 3.0 · May 2026

This document is a public summary. Certain strategic and partner engagement details have been omitted. A full detailed version is available to qualified parties under NDA.

© 2026 Glafabra Therapeutics. All rights reserved. · chris@glafabra.com